A Study of Medical Negligence Cases decided By the District Consumer Courts of Delhi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/Keywords:
Medical Negligence, Damage, Damages, Duty, Dereliction of Duty, CompensationAbstract
Indian Medical Association vs. V.P. Shantha and Ors (1995) is a three-Judge Bench decision. The principal issue which arose for decision by the Court was whether a medical practitioner renders 'service' and can be proceeded against for 'deficiency in service' before a forum under the COPRA, 86. There is an urgent need to check increasing trend in number of medical negligence cases and deteriorating quality of healthcare in India. Study of decided cases of medical negligence can provide an insight into the reasons for medical negligence cases, factors mainly responsible for medical negligence and impact of doctor-patient relationship, etc. This study is attempted to explore the insight into ground realities & problems in the present healthcare system with ways & means to prevent these in healthcare institutions and medical fraternity. High cost of healthcare coupled with practice of defensive medicine will further aggravate the situation. Out of 48 cases studied 43 (89.58%) belongs to private hospitals and only 05 (10.42%) belongs to Government Hospitals. Surgical & Allied specialties and investigational specialties are more at risk of alleged medical negligence and subsequent probability of proof of medical negligence. Outcome of this study will definitely beneficial for all, for healthcare provider it will help in improving the quality of healthcare and doctor-patient relationship, restoration of lost trust in medical profession.
Downloads
References
Indian Medical Association vs. V.P. Shantha and Ors. (1995) 6 SCC 651.
Supreme Court‟s Landmark Judgment: Docs can be Sued for Compensation; Hindustan Times, Nov.14, 1995.
Planning Commission Skeptical About Govt.‟s „Consumer Right Day‟ Initiative; Times of India; Dec. 29, 2000: 3.
Jackson & Powell on Professional Negligence, 3rd Edn., paras 1- 04, 1-05, and 1-56)
Kounteya Sinha. „India records 5.2m med injuries a yr‟. The Times of India, New Delhi Edition, September 21, 2013: 15.]
Kounteya Sinha. Medical Negligence: Govt. to provide cover. The Times of India, New Delhi Edition, September 16, 2009
Dr. Laxman Balkrishna Joshi v. Dr. Trimbak Bapu Godbole and Anr. (1969) 1 SCR 206.
Damayanti Datta. Doctors in the dock: Will fuzzy laws and frivolous cases change the way medicine is practiced in India? India Today, October 9, 2014, Available at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/litigation-doctors-medicine-law
national-accreditation-board-for-hospitals/1/394983.html
S.S. Ahmad, J., D.P. Wadhwa, J. State of Haryana & Ors. vs. Smt. Santra, Date of Judgment: 24.04.2000, Available at: http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=16386
Whitehouse vs. Jordon (1981) 1 All ER 267 (HL); (1981) 1 ALL ER 267.
M/s Spring Meadows Hospital & Anr. vs. Harjol Ahluwalia through K.S. Ahluwalia & Anr. JT 1998(2) SC 620.
R.C. Lahoti, CJI, G.P. Mathur, J., P.K. Balasubramanyan, J. Jacob Mathew vs. State of Punjab & Anr., Appeal (Crl.) 144-145 of 2004, Date of Judgment: 05.08.2005, http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=27088
A.S. Mittal vs. State of U.P. AIR 1989 SC 1570,
Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 issued by the Medical Council of India under Section 20A read with Section 3(m) of the Indian Medical Council Act 1956.
