Age Estimation from Teeth with Critical Analysis of Gustafson’s Method

Authors

  • P C Sarmah Prof & HOD Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences, Gangtok, Sikkim
  • Ashim Mishra Assistant Professor Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences, Gangtok, Sikkim
  • Abhishek Das Assistant Professor Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences, Gangtok, Sikkim
  • B V Subhramanyam Former Prof & HOD, Dept. of FMT, RIMS, Imphal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Gustafson’s Method, Age, Central Incisor, Attrition

Abstract

In this era of evidence based medicine much of expertise in field of Forensic Odontology is drawn  from basic research and experience. Teeth are better preserved than other material, so their use for identification of an individual's age at death is very important .Ever since its inception Gustafson’s method  for determination of age from permanent teeth is considered gold standard even though many workers  have dealt with the topic extensively, and critically determined the error factors involved. The present  study reveals that the central incisor is the best age indicator with a standard error of ±6.35 years, and in  combination of canine and first molar gives age estimation within an error of ±5.35 years. The first molar  alone being the first to erupt in permanent series is found less useful age indicator (error±8.15 years). In  contradiction to many researchers and Gustafson himself, this study points that attrition constitutes the  most reliable parameter. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lampe H, Roetzscher K. Forensic odontology: age determination from adult human teeth Med Law. 1994; 13 (7-8):623-8.

Gustafson G. Age determination on teeth. Journal of the American Dental Association 1950; 41: 45-54

Gustafson G. Forensic Odontology: London-Staples Press, 1966 4. Ball J. A critique of age estimation using attrition as the sole indicator. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2002 Dec; 20(2):38-42. 5. B. Rai, S Dhattarwal, S Anand. Five Markers of Changes in Teeth: An Estimating of Age. The Internet Journal of Forensic Science. 2005; 1:2

Miles A. E.W. Dentition in the estimation of age. J. Dent. Res.1963; 42:255-63

Sognanaes R. F. Talking teeth: American Scientist 1976; July-Aug: 369-73

Pillai P.S, Bhaskar G.R. Age estimation from teeth using Gustafson’s method –A study in India: Forensic science.1974; 3:135-141

Johanson G., Lindenstam B. Dental Evidence in Identification. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1968; 25(6):834-38

Metzger Z, Buchner A, Gorsky M. Gustafson's method for age determination from teeth--a modification for the use of dentists in identification teams. J Forensic Sci. 1980 Oct; 25(4):742-9.

Published

2015-07-30

How to Cite

Sarmah, P. C., Mishra, A., Das, A., & Subhramanyam , B. V. (2015). Age Estimation from Teeth with Critical Analysis of Gustafson’s Method . Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 37(2), 169-172. https://doi.org/10.48165/