Abnormal Anatomical Position and Number of Renal Artery at the Renal Hilum

Authors

  • Rajiv Ranjan Sinha Assist.Prof, Dept. of Anatomy
  • Binod Kumar Assist.Prof, Dept. of Anatomy
  • Kumar Ashish Intern, Dept. of Skin 7VD, PMCH, Patna
  • Md Jawed Akhtar Senior Resident, Dept. of Anatomy IGIMS, Patna
  • Aman Kumar Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine &Toxicology Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sheikpura, Patna, Bihar, India
  • Sanjeev Kumar Assist. Prof, Dept. of FMT
  • Vinod Kumar Prof & HOD, Dept. of Anatomy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Accessory renal artery, Segmental resection, renal hilum, Variations, court of law, Negligence

Abstract

The development of the renal vessels, account for the fact of the complicate development of the kidney. The present study was under taken in 20 embalmed cadavers. Careful dissection of renal hilar structures was carried out to observe antero-posterior relationship of structures at the hilum of the kidney. In majority, the arrangement was according to the normal textbook description i.e. renal vein, renal artery and renal pelvis arranged antero-posteriorly. In 5% of cases renal artery was seen in front of renal vein and renal pelvis at the hilum. In present study, two cadavers showed one Lt Accessory renal arteries and bilateral abnormal arrangement of hilar structure at hilum.The knowledge of variations of the renal vessels forms and its abnormal arrangement at hilum are essential guideline for Urosurgeon during the kidney transplantation and segmental resection for hilar mass. It is also helpful for physician in diagnosis of different renal disease caused by compression of ureter by renal vessels; the wrong diagnosis of which may create problem in the court of law when a case of negligence is brought against a treating physician.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Standrings Gray’s Anatomy. The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, New York. 38th edition; p 1271-74.

Nayak BS. Multiple variations of the right renal vessels. Singapore Med J 2008:49; e153-e155.

SYKES D. The arterial supply of the human kidney with special reference to accessory arteries. British Journal of Surgery, 1963:50; 368-374. P Mid: 13979763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ bjs.18005022204

Sampaio FJ, Passos MA. Renal arteries: anatomic study for surgical and radiological practice. Surgical and Radiological Anatomy, 1992:14(2); 113 -117. P Mid: 1641734. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01794885

Madhyastha S., Suresh R, Rao R. Multiple variations of renal vessels and ureter. Indian journal of Urology, 2001:17(2); 164-165.

Bordei P., Sapte E, Iliescu D. Double renal artery originating from aorta. Surgical and Radiological Anatomy, 2004: 26(6); 474-479. P Mid: 15378279. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s00276-004-0272-9

Felix W. Mesonephric arteries (aa. mesonephrica). In KEIBEL, F. and MALL, FP. (Eds.). Manual of Human Embryology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1912: 22; 820-825.

Bindhu S, Venunadhan A, Banu Z, Danesh S. Multiple vascular variations in a single cadaver: A case report. Recent Research in Science and Technology 2010:2; 127-129.

Published

2015-07-30

How to Cite

Sinha, R. R., Binod Kumar, Ashish, K., Akhtar, M. J., Kumar, A., Kumar, S. . ., & Kumar, V. . . (2015). Abnormal Anatomical Position and Number of Renal Artery at the Renal Hilum. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 37(2), 187-189. https://doi.org/10.48165/