Study of Fingerprint Patterns in South Indian Population

Authors

  • Nithin Mathew Sam Junior Consultant, Department of Forensic Medicine, General Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, India – 680001
  • Rema P Prof, Dept. of Forensic Medicine, Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala
  • Venugopalan Nair B Former Deputy Director, State Fingerprint Bureau, Kerala Police

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Dactylography, Fingerprint Pattern, Gender Difference, Identification

Abstract

Study of finger prints as a method of identification is known as Dactylography or Dactyloscopy  Dactylography is a progressing science and new methods for the recording, lifting and developing of  prints under different field conditions, including those from the decomposed body, are being introduced  regularly. Identification using finger prints is absolute and infallible. Since the turn of the century, finger  prints have been used as a very effective means of establishing identity of the individual. Study of finger  prints as a method of identification is known as Dactylography. The present study was conducted on 100  males and 100 females of South Indian Population aged between 18 and 81 years. Rolled fingerprints  were obtained using pre-inked strips, and their patterns were identified. Each type of fingerprint pattern  and their subtypes were identified and analysed for gender differences. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Karmakar RN. J B Mukherjee‟s Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 3rd Ed; 2007: 166-173.

Nandy A. Principles of Forensic Medicine. 3rd Ed. New Central Book Agency (P) Ltd; 2010: 158-163.

Kumar A. Textbook of Forensic Medicine, Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology). 1st ed. Avichal Publishing Company; 2011: 4-5. 4. Mathiharan K, Patnaik AK. Modi‟s Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology. 23rd ed. Lexis Nexus Butterworth; 2005: 314-320. 5. Vij K. Textbook of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology- Principles and Practice. 5th ed. Reed Elsevier India (P) Ltd; 2011: 62-64. 6. Dikshit PC. Textbook of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 1st ed. Peepee Publishers and Distributors (P) Ltd; 2007: 80-85. 7. Basu R. Fundamentals of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 1st ed. Books and Allied (P) Ltd; 2003:40-44.

Mant AK. Taylor‟s Principles and Practice of Medical Jurisprudence. 13th ed. B I Churchill Livingston; 1994: 176-177. 9. Parikh CK. Parikh‟s Textbook of Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology. 5th Ed; 1986: 53-57.

Reddy KSN. The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 31st Ed; 2012: 76-79.

Polson CJ. The Essentials of Forensic Medicine, 2nd ed. Pergamon Press Ltd; 1965: 75-78.

Bardale R. Principles of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 1st ed. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2011: 72-76.

Chandrachud YV, Manohar V R, Singh A. Ratanlal and Dhirajlali‟s – The Code of Criminal Procedure Code. 18th ed. Wadhwa and Company; 2006

Saukko P, Knight B. Knight‟s Forensic Pathology, 3rd ed. Hodder Arnold; 2004: 101-102.

Krishnan M KR. Handbook of Forensic Medicine. 3rd Ed; 1971: 47- 51.

Padmanabhan AM. Role of Fingerprint Science in Police and Judiciary. 1st Ed; 2008.

Published

2016-01-30

How to Cite

Sam, N. M., P, R., & Nair B , V. (2016). Study of Fingerprint Patterns in South Indian Population . Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 37(4), 369-373. https://doi.org/10.48165/