Medico-legal Aspect of Pregnancy and Delivery: A Critical Case Review

Authors

  • Mukesh Yadav Professor & Head, Dept. of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Rama Medical College, Hapur, U.P
  • Pooja Rastogi Prof & Head, SMSR, Sharda University Greater Noida, U.P.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Antenatal Care, LSCS, Cerebral Palsy, Compensation, Deficiency in Service, Complications, Damage

Abstract

For all parents and grandparents, birth is a joy, a wonder and a renewal of hope. But, one of the  most devastating, life-changing events for parents is finding out their child suffered cerebral palsy.  NCDRC while awarding compensation observed that human life is most precious; it is extremely difficult  to decide the quantum of compensation in the medical negligence cases. NCDRC pointed out the  difficulty in calculation of compensation and further observed that the multiplier method which typically  used in motor accident cases not often conclusive for „just and adequate compensation‟. Hon‘ble  Supreme Court has held that there is no restriction that courts can award compensation only up to what is  demanded by the complainant. NCDRC cautioned that the corporate hospitals and Specialists, as might  be expected, must perform at a higher level than other hospitals/ general practitioners.  This paper deals with critical analysis of NCDRC Judgment dated 24th April 2015 to understand  the reasons for medical negligence, factors and methods for calculation of compensation in medical  negligence cases and accordingly recommend for prevention of such cases in future. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J.M. Malik, J., Presiding Member, NCDRC, Mr. Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member, NCDRC. Dr. (Mrs.) Indu Sharma vs. Indraprastha Apollo Hospital and Ors. O.P./104/2002, Date of Judgment: 24.04.2015. [Online] [2015 April 27]. Available from:URL:http://cms.nic.in/ncdrcusersWeb/GetJudgement.do?meth

od=GetJudgement&caseidin=0%2F0%2FOP%2F104%2F2002&dtof hearing=2015-04-22

B.N. Agrawal, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J., G.S. Singhvi, J. Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences vs. Prasanth S. Dhananka & Ors., Civil Appeal No.4119 of 1999, with With C.A. No. 3126 of 2000, Date of Judgment: 14.05.2009; [2009 (7) SCALE 407]. Available from: URL:http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=34648

V. Gopala Gowda, J., Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J. Dr. Balram Prasad vs. Dr. Kunal Saha & Ors., Civil Appeal No.2867 of 2012, with Civil Appeal No.692 of 2012, Advanced Medicare & Research Institute Ltd. vs. Dr. Kunal Saha & Ors., with Civil Appeal No.2866 of 2012 Dr. Kunal Saha & Ors. vs. Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee & Ors., with Civil Appeal No.731 of 2012, Dr. Baidyanath Haldar vs. Dr. Kunal Saha & Ors., and with Civil Appeal No.858 of 2012, Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee & Ors. vs. Dr. Kunal Saha & Ors., Date of Judgment: 24th Oct 2013; (2014) 1 SCC 384. [Online] [2015 May 12]. Available from: URL:http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=40897

Dr. Laxman Balakrishna Joshi vs. Dr. Trimbak Bapu Godbole & Anr. AIR 1969 SC 128

A.S. Mittal vs. State of U.P. AIR 1989 SC 1570.

Malay Kumar Ganguly vs. Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee & Ors. [(2009) 9 SCC 221]

Published

2016-01-30

How to Cite

Yadav, M., & Rastogi , P. (2016). Medico-legal Aspect of Pregnancy and Delivery: A Critical Case Review . Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 37(4), 415-421. https://doi.org/10.48165/