Role of Foot Impressions and Boot Marks A Comparative Evaluation on Soft and Hard Materials

Authors

  • Harpreet Singh Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine MMIMSR Mullana Ambala
  • Sandeep Garg Post Graduate Student, Department of Forensic Medicine MMIMSR Mullana Ambala
  • Kanika Kohli Post Graduate Student, Department of Forensic Medicine MMIMSR Mullana Ambala
  • Arif Viqar Post Graduate Student, Department of Forensic Medicine MMIMSR Mullana Ambala
  • OP Aggarwal Prof & HOD Department of Forensic Medicine MMIMSR Mullana Ambala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Foot prints,, Crime scene, POP cast, Shoe prints, Evidence, Rural areas

Abstract

The foot print of a suspected person is valuable Forensic evidence along with other evidences at  the place of crime scene investigation. The foot print can be studied by anatomists, anthropologists,  physicians, podiatrists and orthopaedicians. Foot can be studied by foot prints and shoe prints. Present  study conducted to ascertain the foot impressions and boot marks as means of identification of  individuals, to compare dimensions of foot impression and boot mark on papers and POP casts and to  know the value of POP cast footprint. The foot prints are lifted by POP cast from the crime scene. The  foot prints of suspects can be taken on soft and hard materials for comparison. The evidence on a hard  material is difficult to carry as compared to soft materials however both are equally important. Foot prints  are found more common in the rural areas mainly in the fields because of mud. It is difficult to find foot  print on the cemented structures in urban areas.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mathiharan K and Patnaik AK. Modi’s Medical jurisprudence and toxicology.23rd edition. New Delhi, Lexis Nexis Butterworths; 2005. P. 323-324.

Parikh CK. Parikh’s textbook of Medical Jurisprudence, Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 6th edition. New Delhi. CBS publishers and distributors Pvt. ltd; 2011; p 2.16

Kennedy RBA. Uniqueness of bare feet and its use as a possible means of identification. Forensic Science International 1996 Sep; 82(1):81-87.

Kerstholt JHA, Paashuis R, Sjerps M. Shoe print examinations: Effects of expectation, complexity and experience. Forensic Science International 2007 Jan; 165(1):30-34

Zeybek GA, Ergur I, Demiroglu ZA. Stature and gender estimation using foot measurements. Forensic Science International 2008 Oct;181(1):54

Sen J, Ghosh S. Estimation of stature from foot length and foot breath among the Rajbanshi; An indigenous population of north Bengal. Forensic Science International 2008 Oct;181(1):55

Krishan K. Estimation of stature from foot print and foot outline dimensions in Gujjars of north India. Forensic Science International 2008 March;175(2):93-101

Kanchan T, Menezes RG, Moudgil R, Kaur R, Kotian MS, Garg RK. Stature estimation from foot dimension. Forensic Science International 2008 Aug; 179(2):241

Moorthy N, Samsudin WNZWM, Ismail MS. A study of foot prints of Malaysian athletes and non athletes for application during Forensic Comparison. Malaysian Journal of Forensic Sciences 2011; 2(1):29.

Published

2014-04-30

How to Cite

Singh, H., Garg, S., Kohli, K., Viqar, A., & Aggarwal , O. (2014). Role of Foot Impressions and Boot Marks A Comparative Evaluation on Soft and Hard Materials . Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 36(1), 40-42. https://doi.org/10.48165/