Diagnosis of Electric Injuries: Histopathological Examination

Authors

  • Bharath Kumar Guntheti 1Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine, Mamata Medical College, Rotary Nagar, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh 5070002.India
  • Uday pal Singh Professor Department of Forensic Medicine, Mamata Medical College, Rotary Nagar, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh 5070002.India
  • Shaik Khaja Prof & HOD Department of Forensic Medicine, Mamata Medical College, Rotary Nagar, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh 5070002.India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Electric current, Joule Burn, Streaming of Nuclei, Histopathological changes

Abstract

The biggest challenge for a Forensic Pathologist is in the diagnosis of electrocution. This study  consists eleven cases of electrical shock, which were brought to Mamata General Hospital Khammam,  Andhra Pradesh; from Sept 2007 to Oct 2008. The characteristic feature of electrocution being electric  contact mark over the body was not present in all mostall cases. Some time it is difficult for Forensic  Pathologist to obtain electric mark by histopathological examination. The diagnosis of electrocution is  confirmed by histopathological changes in skin. In all cases identified as dead due to electrocution  samples were collected, preserved and undertaken for histopathological examination. The main objective  is histopathological examination could be an important aid in diagnosis of Electrocution, where the  findings were suggestive of electrical injuries. Considering the histopathological changes, nuclear  steaming, dermo-epidermal separation and coagulative necrosis were the commonest features in skin  with electric contact mark. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Polson Cyril John, Gee D J& Knight B. The Essentials of Forensic Medicine, 1985, 4th edition, oxford: Pergamon press, Electrical injuries. P 271-280.

Mellen P F, Weedn V W, Kao G. Electrocution: A review of 155 cases with emphasis on human factors. J Forensic Sci.1992; 37:1016-22.

Vij K. Text Book of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 4th Ed. Elsevier Publication, New Delhi 2007.Death by Electrocution, pp.235

Pekka Saukko, Bernard Knight. Knight’s Forensic Pathology 3rd edition ,Arnold publishers New York, 2004, Electrical Fatalities; pp326-333

Jurgen Ludwig. Hand book of Autopsy Practice. 3rd edition, Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey USA .Electrical Burns, pp.363.

C G Tedeschi, William G., Eckert and Luke G. Tedeschi. Forensic Medicine, volume 1, Mechanical Trauma. Injury by Electrical Force .pp.645-657, W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, London, Toronto 1977.

K. Mathiharan and A K Patnaik. Modi’s Text Book of Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology, 23rd Ed Lexis and Nexis, India, New delhi.20076 45. Electricity pp. 646

Regula Wick. Fatal electrocution in Adults -30 years study. Med. Sci. Law 2006; 46[2]:160-172.

Odesanmi W O. Things are not always what they seem! Joule burns in electrocution- a report of four cases. Med. Sci. Law, 1987; 27[1]:63-67.

Davis M. Burns caused by electricity, a review of seventy cases. British journal of plastic surgery, 1958; 288[11]:288-300.

Chandru K. Study of electrical injuries in fatal cases at Victoria Hospital Bangalore [Nov 2003 to Oct 2005].JIAFM, July-Dec2010; vol4:235-238

Baiely B, Forget S, Gaudreault P. Prevalence of potential risk factors in victims of Electrocution. Forensic Sci Int, 2001; 123:58- 62.

Kusa Kumar Shaha and A Edwin Joe. Electrocution –related mortality: a retrospective review of 118 deaths in Coimbatore, India, between Jan 2002 and Dec 2006.Med Sci Law 2010; 50:72- 74.

Vincent J. M., Di Maio, Suzanna E. Dana. Forensic Pathology.1st edition, published by Viva Books Private Limited, New Delhi, 1999.Electrocution pp. 202.

Manish Shreegiriwar, Rajesh Bardale, P G Dixit. Electrocution: A six year study of Electrical fatalities, JIAFM 2007; 29[2]:50-53.

Published

2014-07-30

How to Cite

Guntheti, B. K., Singh, U. pal, & Khaja , S. (2014). Diagnosis of Electric Injuries: Histopathological Examination. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 36(2), 137-141. https://doi.org/10.48165/